You are here: Home>>News>>Riveting Machine News

What Kinds of Automatic Riveting Machines Exist? Handheld, Fixed, Dual-Gun and Robotic Cell Compared - CHANRUI

Published: 2026-01-05 16:04:32 Views: 772 views Author: admin

What kinds of automatic riveting machines exist? Handheld, fixed, dual-gun and robotic cell compared

By form and automation level, automatic riveting machines usually fall into four categories: handheld automatic rivet gun, tabletop/fixed model, one-out-of-two dual-gun model and robotic riveting cell. They are not a simple ""high vs. low end"" relationship, but rather match different product structures, volumes and investment stages. This article explains each one and offers selection advice.

I. The four model types compared

Type	Working principle	Typical scenario	Highlights
Handheld automatic rivet gun	The worker moves with the gun, while the main unit feeds rivets automatically	Large parts, scattered points, high-mix small-batch	Flexible, low investment, quick to learn
Tabletop/fixed	Workpiece fixed onto a workbench/fixture	Small parts, fixed stations, closely spaced points	Consistency is good, fixtures can be used
One-out-of-two dual gun	Two guns rivet simultaneously	Standardized shells, cabinet mass-production lines	Dual station, with efficiency nearly doubled
Robotic riveting cell	The robot holds the gun, moving and feeding automatically	Large-batch fixed points, for example battery trays and automotive parts	Unmanned operation, stable cycle, project-based integration

Photo: handheld automatic rivet gun, suited to large, high-mix, scattered-point work

II. Further breakdown by feeding and gun type

Beyond equipment form, they can also be split by process and feed structure: by process into automatic riveting machines (blind rivets/pull rivets), automatic rivet nut guns (rivet nuts) and automatic rivet guns; by feed structure, the common types are vibratory-bowl and disc-hopper - the vibratory bowl offers strong sorting versatility, while the disc hopper changes over fast and runs quieter; by gun count into single gun and one-out-of-two dual gun. CHANRUI common models deliver about 12,800N pulling force and a cycle of about 80/minute, with greater force and special strokes customizable.

III. Typical choices across industries

Industry	Typical workpieces	Typical model
Computer/server/communication cases and cabinets	Case panels and cabinet frames	Handheld gun plus fixed, with dual gun for mass-production lines
Automotive parts	Interior parts, brackets and assemblies	Dual gun, robotic cell
New energy lithium battery/photovoltaic	Battery trays, structural parts and frames	Mostly robotic riveting cells
Sheet metal/power cabinets/home appliances, kitchen and bath	Cabinets, housings and brackets	Handheld gun, fixed

Photo: robotic riveting cell, ideal for large-batch, fixed-point standardized lines

IV. Selection and upgrade route

Most enterprises prefer "step-by-step automation": first pilot with a handheld or fixed standard machine to replace manual rivet threading and loading, with one machine replacing about 3 workers and typical payback in 2-6 months; once volume and standardization grow, add a dual gun or robotic cell, and the main-unit platform expands smoothly. Customers can choose by their industry characteristics, such as automotive parts, electronic cases, new energy, sheet-metal power distribution and home appliances; for details seeIndustry Application Solutions。

V. Investment and payback across the four model types

Type	Investment level	Payback profile
Handheld automatic rivet gun	Entry level, smallest investment	Replaces loading labor immediately, usually with the fastest payback
Tabletop/fixed	Mid level (with workbench fixture)	Yield gains from improved consistency, with stable payback
One-out-of-two dual gun	Upper-mid level	Mass-production shell efficiency nearly doubles, more cost-effective per cycle
Robotic riveting cell	Project-based investment	Calculated from whole-line labor savings and unmanned benefits, suited to large-batch dedicated lines

Note: the specific price varies with pulling force, feeding method and non-standard workload and must be quoted by rivet and workpiece; payback is typically 2-6 months, subject to trial measurement data.

VI. A simple selection decision flow

Step one, look at the rivet: fix the type and spec range; step two, look at volume: multi-variety small-batch leans toward handheld/fixed, while large-batch fixed points lean toward dual gun/robot; step three, look at budget and stage: pilot with a standard machine, then roll out upgrades; step four, close the loop with trial data: sign only after on-site sampling verifies cycle and yield. Following this sequence, you basically will not pick the wrong direction.

Model Selection FAQ

Model FAQ

Q1: On a limited budget, which should you start with?

Start with a handheld automatic rivet gun or a tabletop fixed standard machine - low investment and quick effect, automating the most labor-intensive loading step first.

Q2: Is a dual gun always the right fit for mass production?

A dual gun suits standardized workpieces with two symmetric columns and dense points; with scattered points or frequent changeovers the benefit is limited, so a trial comparison is advised.

Q3: Does a robotic cell require a production line?

A robotic cell can run as a single station or connect to a whole line, and is usually built into a project solution as a workstation, needing workpiece point and cycle data.

Q4: Same-type models from different makers differ widely in price - where does the difference lie?

Mainly in feed-mechanism and component grade, machining/assembly precision, in-house trial thoroughness and after-sales parts capability. It is best to inquire with the same rivet specs and acceptance standard, and decide after a trial comparison.